I know exactly what you are talking about, and right now I wouldn't endorse any current politician for cleaning port-o-lets, but all I'm saying is OWS is so big, even a whisper makes a lot of noise. So the prudent thing would be to wait, at least until summer. See what the temperature is.
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:46 PM, <firstname.lastname@example.org>
I usually voted for third parties until Bush's second election, when I switched to the lessor evil thing, and now I'm sorry I did, because the Democrats keep passing and signing Republican policies, and the Republicans get to blame "the liberals" for the resulting disasters. I'd rather have Republicans taking credit for the disasters wrought by supply side economics and deregulation.
On 11/01/11, Andy Anderson<email@example.com> wrote:
As much as I hate to say it, I think a choice of lesser evils may be better for the country than protest voting. Its early and next year should bring us many more people that are awake. But that may also make things more dangerous, both for us in particular, and for our supporters. An idiotic ideologue that ends up bringing in our military "to keep the peace" would not be good for anyone. My solo opinion, and I know it could be argued for hours. Just something to think about.
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:08 PM, <firstname.lastname@example.org>
I think its a little late for it this year, but a write-in the 99% campaign for next year's presidential election might be effective.
On 11/01/11, JeremyToG<email@example.com> wrote:
So Election Day is on the second, and even if it's not the most
important year for the consequences of it, I had a neat little idea to
express dissatisfaction with the candidates shown and show solidarity
for the movement's purpose:
When you vote, if you don't particularly care for any of the options
available, instead write-in "The 99 Percent" as a protest vote.
I wonder how many we could get...