From:   Andrea Ciannavei <andrea.ciannavei@gmail.com>
Sent time:   Sunday, November 13, 2011 9:19:24 AM
To:   globalrevolutionmedia@googlegroups.com
Subject:   Re: [GlobalRevolutionMedia] Fw: Supposed to vote 2wice?
 

i don't see why the facilitator shouldn't be allowed to since its and up and down vote and does not concern the process itself or the facilitator or his/her role.


On Nov 13, 2011, at 11:15 AM, Alexander Penley wrote:

Good question, as one who leads the process and sets up the criteria and process of voting- should one be allowed to vote? I would say when one threatens blocks by others if the process does not change, this sets precedent which might bite us in the butt? Other ideas?

On Nov 13, 2011 11:09 AM, "Jaime Fallon" <jaimexo@gmail.com> wrote:
I would like to put this to the group.

As facilitator, am I allowed to vote?

Thank you.

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 3:37 AM, DMS <davidscameracraft@gmail.com> wrote:
> That sounds correct.
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:49 PM, <andrew@thehumanchannel.org> wrote:
>>
>> I think everyone must vote for 2 am I wrong? In order for it to work?
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: andrew@thehumanchannel.org
>> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 03:36:07
>> To: <jaimexo@gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: andrew@thehumanchannel.org
>> Subject: Supposed to vote 2wice?
>>
>> That protocol wasn't defined....
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
>

Andrea Ciannavei
andrea.ciannavei@gmail.com
646-326-4896



< PREV INDEX SEARCH NEXT >