I'd like to echo this sentiment. Not that what we're doing is not of interest to those in power, but that we have nothing to hide. On the contrary, we are law enforcement, in the truest sense of the term. While getting off corporate networks is great, I would disagree with the sentiment that privacy of any kind is needed with regards to our strategies, intentions, and actions. (care should be taken for identities of people who live in areas where they could be abducted by authorities, etc, but assuming the USA in 2011 here).
On the contrary, we should be walking the walk with regards to publishing as much as possible about everything we are doing. This is crucial. We have NOTHING to hide, and open source isn't just a means, it's the objective. It is what can create an alternative model of governance, so let's start now. Disclose everything.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Chaz Cheadle <email@example.com>
Mary (not one of those Koches!),
I agree with you 100%!
For the promotion of FLO initiatives, we should move off Google applications, but for privacy/security concerns we have nothing to hide, and couldn't if we wanted to. The US government has this thing called the FBI and another called the Patriot Act.
If the corporations do see us coming- let them tremble.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Flameproof Witch <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Believe me, we are not so dangerous that corporations are spying on us
full-time. I use google groups, google apps, private Facebook groups.
Trying to come up with secure stuff is wasting time.
Censoring and moderating have no place here. I want to debate anyone
who says they do.
I guess lots of you are new to blogging, etc.
Mary Koch, not those Koches