Subject: [NYCGA Internet] Re: A Wiki for ALL working groups? Forthcoming?
From: Jake
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
To: internet working group
CC: Drew Hornbain <drew@nycga.net>

I think we're all aware of the major group dynamics/workflow/
collaboration/outreach problems right now. Trying to organize a big
meeting about this tonight. Drew is leading the charge to make this
happen. Stay tuned for more.

On Oct 20, 11:24 am, "Charles Lenchner" <clench...@organizing20.org>
wrote:
There is a wiki. Devin showed it to me. I can't remember clearly if this was
meant to expand to include all GA/OWS activities or not, but it definitely
included the development efforts led by the FLO WG.
It doesn't make sense to me that this would be somehow separate from an IWG
wiki.

That said, and I'm writing with love, there are issues around making it
clear, in writing, at a clear address, what is happening, who is doing it,
and what the contact points are for newcomers to join in.

The priority has been rushing forward with development, which makes perfect
sense. There is room for configuring other priorities, like accessibility
for newcomers, transparency/documentation for other WG's at other occupy
sites, and identifying individuals as 'accountable' for particular pieces in
a public, easy to find location.

Charles







-----Original Message-----
From: internet_working_group@googlegroups.com

[mailto:internet_working_group@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jake
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 11:21 AM
To: internet working group
Subject: [NYCGA Internet] Re: A Wiki for ALL working groups? Forthcoming?

afaik, IWG is not working on a wiki right now

On Oct 20, 6:20 am, felipe ribeiro <felip...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey All

I'm wondering what the plans are for building a wiki for all of the
working groups to list resources, assets, projects, etc. I know there
are tons of disparate wikis, and that's kind of the point. What are
the plans for building this functionality into the main site? Would it
be a massively duplicate effort to get one underway, even if it means
copying/migrating content later into whatever "official" wiki ends up
being built? If anyone else is working on this, I'd like to work with
you. Otherwise, let's get this going! (I'm aware FLO has something in
the pipe, wondering if there are other instances/intentions besides that).

thanks!

felipe

< PREV INDEX SEARCH NEXT >