Blow the whistle!
Offensive and defensive foul.
I suggest you two discuss peacefully off the listserve and let's try
to keep online engagement cordial.
We're all trying our best here and we're all on the same team. Let's
try to find more productive ways of problem solving. You guys are both
doing awesome jobs! Thanks from millions of people worldwide.
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 7:33 AM, <email@example.com> wrote:
I said if anyone wanted to cover the GA they could. They want to know our
opinions. I give my opinions when they ask. The GA as it stands is becoming
extremely counter productive.
Who the hell are you to tell me how to do the livestream? I've been covering
GA's for weeks. Have you ever covered one on the livestream? I didn't think
so. I don't like doing them so I won't. Just because you like it doesn't
mean I do.
And for your dumb ass information I couldn't bring the computer over so I
stopped streaming. Listened in on the GA and reported back everything that
was discussed. I do whatever the streamers ask.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
From: ddotto <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 04:30:59 -0400
Subject: Re: [GlobalRevolutionMedia] Why is Live Stream not covering the
We should have our General Assembly covered. Dwayne, if you don't want to do
it, don't. Who cares what you personally want to cover? I certainly don't.
The General Assembly is among the most important aspects of this movement,
and it absolutely should be broadcast to the thousands of viewers who link
up with us every night during our GA. If you don't want to cover it, then
get the fuck off camera and give it to someone else. Alternatively, you can
do what you volunteered to do - the job of anchor representation of the
LiveStream events at OWS. How do you imagine that you personally can decide
what we off-site participants get to view? The General Assembly has NOT
elected you Supreme Editor of Worthy LiveStream Subject Matter. And, as per
Thorin's relinquishment of autonomy from GA accountability on October 21,
your actions are now subject to the decisions of the General Assembly; so...
get with the program.
I acknowledge that my impertinent and angry remarks about this subject are
not conducive to friendly or productive dialogue.
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Dwayne Henry <email@example.com> wrote:
I personally did not want to cover the GA. It's painstaking to sit
through. I asked the chat and it was a 50/50 split on whether they wanted
to see it or not. My computer also did not have enough charge to go off of
the battery to cover it.
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Cari Machet <firstname.lastname@example.org>
frankly it probably would not have broadcast well as drumming was
drowning it out and the sound probably would have not worked well
On 10/22/11, Steven Macchia <email@example.com> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 11:03 PM, J B <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Very sorry about the GA coverage this evening. We're working to build
new homebase so we should have much better coverage starting tomorrow.
Thanks for your patience,
On Oct 22, 2011 10:49 PM, "Jill T" <email@example.com> wrote:
If the person running the camera doesn't believe in the G.A. then
can't someone else cover it?
This is not fair to the listening audience.
Skype carimachet - 646-652-6434
Syria +963-099 277 3243
Amman +962 077 636 9407
Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>
Dwayne Henry, Media Design MFA
c. 732 850 6093
revolution - transformation - love