Subject: Re: [GlobalRevolutionMedia] Why is Live Stream not covering the G.A.
From: Dallas
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:35:00 -0400
To: globalrevolutionmedia@googlegroups.com

along the same lines.  one solution that I like is the "silent disco"
gear.  an off FCC band of AM i believe.  transmit up to 3 channels to
headsets that can receive any of the 3.

also to be use for video presentations and like has been suggested...
movie night.

by the way, I have Michael Moore on tap to make popcorn for OWS movie
night.  Tues or Wed 10pm.   We will need lots of coverage once I set
this up.

anyone know who is working on this already?  we need to align.

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Wh Ha <whitehatoccupywallst@yahoo.com> wrote:
is this the same idea of using a low power fm transmitter to broadcast the
ga to distributed radios in zuccotti?  i'm a fan of field testing that.
white hat
________________________________
From: Dallas <justdallas@gmail.com>
To: globalrevolutionmedia@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: [GlobalRevolutionMedia] Why is Live Stream not covering the
G.A.

great idea.

also i am working on getting a  tool for facilitation that would
involve mic up front and roaming mic, mixed to output that is
broadcast to wireless headsets in order to repeat to the
back/translate.  Can also use that sound for livestream.

and like Dwayne suggests... a couple quality livestream cameras to be
cut back and forth would help make the GA more engaging for remote
viewers and allow

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Dwayne Henry <dwayne12345@gmail.com> wrote:
It's ok Todd.  Sorry again for snapping back.  I know unless you got a
full
tutorial on livestream it wouldn't be absolutely clear as to the process.

Also Vlad I think more than the boring angle we need to work on the audio
issue.  Ideally if we have 2 to 3 livestream angles it would help up the
production value (something that can be done with the current equipment).

We can put one camera with a mic on the facilitators at all time.  The
second angle can float through the audience to get an angle/mic on
blockers,
concerners, and point of process people.  That would just take 2
livestreamers and someone in the livestream studio mixing the feeds.  When
the crowd is larger we can have 2 floaters to get voices from opposite
sides
of the parks.  The key in this is the livestream studio person paying
attention and cueing up the different angles in a timely fashion.

-Dwayne

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Vlad T <vlad@glassbeadcollective.org>
wrote:

I think to cover GA well we should sit down and think about best ways
tonshoot it.  one angle gets borng but if you alternate angles it might
get
better.  Maybe we should install a cheap security system feeding into a
Broadcasting computer....

On Oct 23, 2011 11:36 AM, "Steven Macchia" <owsmediateam@gmail.com>
wrote:

I second dwaynes last comment, also noting that even the viewers get
bored after a few hours out of a 5 hour GA

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Dwayne Henry <dwayne12345@gmail.com>
wrote:

If I can open up discussion for 1 more moment.

I would like to say that I don't decide what anyone gets to view.  The
person controlling the livestream studio decides what the audience
views.  I
wasn't the only livestreamer at the park during the GA.  I was just the
only
one that admitted on camera that I didn't want to cover it.

Furthermore I don't know what Thorin's personal decisions have to do
with my issue with the way the GA is currently executed.

Cheers

-Dwayne

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:52 AM, DMS <davidscameracraft@gmail.com>
wrote:

Thank you ABE and Dotto for speaking out on this point.

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Dwayne Henry <dwayne12345@gmail.com>
wrote:

My apologies.

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Abraham Heisler
<abe@abrahamheisler.com> wrote:

Blow the whistle!

Offensive and defensive foul.

I suggest you two discuss peacefully off the listserve and let's try
to keep online engagement cordial.

We're all trying our best here and we're all on the same team. Let's
try to find more productive ways of problem solving. You guys are
both
doing awesome jobs! Thanks from millions of people worldwide.

-Abe

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 7:33 AM,  <dwayne12345@gmail.com> wrote:
I said if anyone wanted to cover the GA they could. They want to
know our
opinions. I give my opinions when they ask. The GA as it stands is
becoming
extremely counter productive.

Who the hell are you to tell me how to do the livestream? I've
been
covering
GA's for weeks. Have you ever covered one on the livestream? I
didn't think
so. I don't like doing them so I won't. Just because you like it
doesn't
mean I do.

And for your dumb ass information I couldn't bring the computer
over so I
stopped streaming. Listened in on the GA and reported back
everything that
was discussed. I do whatever the streamers ask.

-Dwayne

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

________________________________
From: ddotto <toddodotto@gmail.com>
Sender: globalrevolutionmedia@googlegroups.com
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 04:30:59 -0400
To: <globalrevolutionmedia@googlegroups.com>
ReplyTo: globalrevolutionmedia@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [GlobalRevolutionMedia] Why is Live Stream not
covering the
G.A.
We should have our General Assembly covered. Dwayne, if you don't
want to do
it, don't. Who cares what you personally want to cover? I
certainly
don't.
The General Assembly is among the most important aspects of this
movement,
and it absolutely should be broadcast to the thousands of viewers
who link
up with us every night during our GA. If you don't want to cover
it, then
get the fuck off camera and give it to someone else.
Alternatively,
you can
do what you volunteered to do - the job of anchor representation
of
the
LiveStream events at OWS. How do you imagine that you personally
can decide
what we off-site participants get to view? The General Assembly
has
NOT
elected you Supreme Editor of Worthy LiveStream Subject Matter.
And, as per
Thorin's relinquishment of autonomy from GA accountability on
October 21,
your actions are now subject to the decisions of the General
Assembly; so...
get with the program.
I acknowledge that my impertinent and angry remarks about this
subject are
not conducive to friendly or productive dialogue.

Todd

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Dwayne Henry
<dwayne12345@gmail.com> wrote:

I personally did not want to cover the GA.  It's painstaking to
sit
through.  I asked the chat and it was a 50/50 split on whether
they wanted
to see it or not.  My computer also did not have enough charge to
go off of
the battery to cover it.

-D

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Cari Machet
<carimachet@gmail.com>
wrote:

frankly it probably would not have broadcast well as drumming
was
drowning it out and the sound probably would have not worked
well

On 10/22/11, Steven Macchia <owsmediateam@gmail.com> wrote:
Manners?

On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 11:03 PM, J B <the1sabin@gmail.com>
wrote:

Hey Jill,

Very sorry about the GA coverage this evening.  We're working
to build
a
new homebase so we should have much better coverage starting
tomorrow.

Thanks for your patience,

Josh
On Oct 22, 2011 10:49 PM, "Jill T" <jillturnerart@gmail.com>
wrote:

If the person running the camera doesn't believe in the G.A.
then
can't someone else  cover it?
This is not fair to the listening audience.





--
Cari Machet
NYC 646-436-7795
carimachet@gmail.com
AIM carismachet
Skype carimachet - 646-652-6434
Syria +963-099 277 3243
Amman +962 077 636 9407
Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>



--
Dwayne Henry, Media Design MFA
c. 732 850 6093




--
revolution  -  transformation  -  love




--
www.AbrahamHeisler.com
www.vimeo.com/heisler
www.imdb.me/heisler
www.newdawnlab.com



--
Dwayne Henry, Media Design MFA
c. 732 850 6093





--
Dwayne Henry, Media Design MFA
c. 732 850 6093





--
Dwayne Henry, Media Design MFA
c. 732 850 6093






< PREV INDEX SEARCH NEXT >