Subject: Re: [NYCGA Internet] Re: Still on the mailing list for Occupyeverywhere??
From: OccupyMARINES2 OccupyMARINES2
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:32:06 +0430
To: internet_working_group@googlegroups.com
CC: Occupy Marines <occupymarines@gmail.com>

Link to SF Gate:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/25/BAUB1LLTC9.DTL

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Tom Gillis <thomaswgillis@gmail.com> wrote:
yes.  any info on working livestreams or other media would be helpful.

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:45 PM, OccupyMARINES2 OccupyMARINES2
<occupymarines2@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you guys following what's going on Oakland?
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Charles Lenchner
> <clenchner@organizing20.org> wrote:
>>
>> Count me as a fan of the moderated list. Let’s slow down traffic and
>> remove irrelevant posts before they hit.
>>
>>
>>
>> Charles
>>
>>
>>
>> PS: Let’s try to imagine a utopian world where lists stay on appropriate
>> topics. It’s like cold fusion, climate cooling and the coming of the
>> Maitreya all at once.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: internet_working_group@googlegroups.com
>> [mailto:internet_working_group@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of evy brown
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:23 PM
>> To: internet_working_group@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: [NYCGA Internet] Re: Still on the mailing list for
>> Occupyeverywhere??
>>
>>
>>
>> Jodi,
>> Thanks for the email.  Now could you please drop back a few.  If you get a
>> message from what you perceive is a non member, that does not mean they are
>> not a supporter or a contributor.  Open your head and your heart.  Not all
>> of us prescribe to a one way or nothing attitude.  ;)
>>
>> My messages are speaking up for and on behalf of the entire movement here
>> is again my posts which should be of import for the mere fact that I am
>> spending time trying to get the message of the movement out against
>> conventional media.  The internet working group should not look at
>> everything in the conventional sense; code writers v. public relations.
>> Internet is a wave length of variables. Go for them all.
>>
>> Earlier I wrote:
>>
>> I'm in California.  Surely, you've got statistics type people gathering
>> data on the ground?  If not, get some.  You need to combat the theory that
>> OWS are doing harm.  If you need help, let me know and I'll come to NY.
>>
>> Here's my latest.
>>
>> http://whistlewatch.org/2011/10/bloomberg-occupy-wall-street-ows-responsible-for-barriers-to-business-whoooo/
>>
>> I also wrote an article recently on how extra food, etc., was going to
>> help homeless shelters and the innovations flourishing in these think tanks
>> were solving problems in record speed.
>>
>> Check the website and get out the word that whistlewatch.org is blowing
>> the whistle on the NY lack of quality journalism and repeated attempts to
>> pit the people against the people.
>>
>>
>> http://whistlewatch.org/2011/10/bloomberg-stirs-the-pulizer-pot-mayor-tries-to-pit-wall-street-workers-against-protesters/
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Jodi Concepcion <owsiwg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> To be clear, i'm receviing these messages in the queue for non members.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am responding as usual, but please advise if there's anything else I can
>> do.
>>
>>
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Jodi~
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Jodi Concepcion <owsiwg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> FYI:
>>
>> The majority of the posts I'm seeing are from:
>>
>> interocc-bounces@occupyeverywhere.org
>>
>> --
>> Jodi ~~
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Evelynn Brown, J.D., LL.M
>> Chief Executive Officer
>> The Brown Center for Public Policy
>>      Ethics in Business Institute
>>      Whistlewatch.org
>>
>>
>> What would you attempt to do if you knew you could not fail?
>>
>> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
>> which it is addressed and may contain confidential/priviledged material. Any
>> review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any
>> action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than
>> the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this information in
>> error, please contact the sender and delete the message and material from
>> all computers.
>

< PREV INDEX SEARCH NEXT >