|Subject: Re: [GlobalRevolutionMedia] Re: Unspeakable Situation at Media Last Night|
|From: Steven Macchia |
|Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 16:50:37 -0400|
Well said Steve. Hopefully this can be discussed today at the meeting
Sent Via IPhone
On Nov 3, 2011, at 16:32, Steven Macchia <email@example.com> wrote:I generally like to stay out of these types of situations, but it's getting really old and I'm tired of everyone pointing fingers at each other.On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Steven Macchia <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
From what I have heard in meetings its a split decision between people who wants to try to work things out between the groups, and people who are firm in their opinions of calling them "infiltrators," and wanting nothing to do with them. However, it's not very easy to communicate between groups when 3/4 of the meetings that are scheduled no one attends.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Nicholas Isabella <email@example.com> wrote:I agree. But We have been trying a long time to bridge the gap between the two live stream teams. I can't speak for anyone else but this personally makes me feel uncomfortable right now. I hope something can be worked out. Is this a possibility or is it beyond that at this point?
Sent Via IPhone
On Nov 3, 2011, at 15:58, Steven Macchia <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Not really... The article seems driven by neither side and andrew wraps it up nicely (thank you) with his quotesOn Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:38 PM, <email@example.com> wrote:
Deal with this in the heart, not as authority figures, and put as much energy into a wrapup video that makes a serious difference to a serious amount of people in understanding this movement. I want to cut in network news footage, Anyone know if a newtork would be allowed to show it if it has other network material?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerryFrom: Vlad T <firstname.lastname@example.org>Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 15:35:25 -0400Subject: Re: [GlobalRevolutionMedia] Re: Unspeakable Situation at Media Last Nightfrom the arcicle we can see who is driving it...On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Steven Macchia <email@example.com> wrote:
And in essence, we give main stream media another things to drill us aboutOn Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Dallas <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Don Carlos Mandingos <email@example.com> wrote:
> I have seen his stuff but I can only stomach so much. I will come and meet
> with you before I leave
> On Nov 3, 2011 3:16 PM, "Vlad T" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> check all his media interviews. where he is the founder of media center,
>> official spokesman etc etc...
>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Don Carlos Mandingos <email@example.com>
>>> On Nov 3, 2011 2:33 PM, "noia efrat" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>>> Ananda, Thorin does not speak for the livestream team - he operates
>>>> independantly of the GA and the principles of OWS.
>>>> He has been a huge problem for us and the entire media team. You
>>>> absolutely should call a meeting about this - it may be a way to approach
>>>> the process of getting him out of the park.
>>>> If Thorin is making physical threats to people, I think it is time to
>>>> draw the line.
>>>> What does eveyone think? Does this warrant a new approach?
>>>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Urbaned <email@example.com>
>>>>> This is terrible. You have my support and love (from the West Coast). I
>>>>> would like to offer you a "Restorative Justice" session, however, it's been
>>>>> difficult for me to set up the group...maybe it will happen one day. In the
>>>>> meantime, some of the men in this movement should know that it still appears
>>>>> predominantly male-oriented. Women are still fighting for their rights, just
>>>>> like the poor and underprivileged.
|< PREV||INDEX||SEARCH||NEXT >|