Subject: Re: [GlobalRevolutionMedia] Livestream should not have filmed Oakland riot on Nov. 2
From: Nicholas Isabella
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 15:06:48 -0500
To: "globalrevolutionmedia@googlegroups.com" <globalrevolutionmedia@googlegroups.com>

Well said vlad. 

Sent Via IPhone

On Nov 6, 2011, at 14:56, Vlad T <vlad@glassbeadcollective.org> wrote:

This is the second time this week the idea of censorship comes up.  the thing is GR will not censor the streams showing the reality on the ground.  idea of censoring anything in this day and age when everyone is armed with a camera in their phone is kind of impossible anyway, and there is also the integrity of truth that has to be maintained. 

On Nov 6, 2011 1:01 AM, "Urbaned" <urbanpubedreform@gmail.com> wrote:
The first sentence on the homepage of the global revolution livestream says that nonviolent protests from independent videographers will be filmed. On Nov. 2, the journalist was filming the riot and calling on all of his friends to tweet the action. Soon, 10,000 collective people were watching on the global revolution and Oakland sites. To this day, the Oakland Occupy Site has a youtube of the bank window being smashed as a statement of victory. I'm confused and concerned about this.
< PREV INDEX SEARCH NEXT >