Subject: Re: [GlobalRevolutionMedia] Re: Legal team contact
From: Cari Machet
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:00:35 -0500
To: globalrevolutionmedia@googlegroups.com

i think it is a frequency level kHz
the gauge is frequency because there are different types of sound so the travel through space is different and measuring through frequency can give you more data on weather it is an annoyance
 
Cari Machet
NYC 646-436-7795
carimachet@gmail.com
AIM carismachet
Skype carimachet - 646-652-6434
Syria +963-099 277 3243
Amman +962 077 636 9407
Twitter: @carimachet
dot connector



On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Dallas <justdallas@gmail.com> wrote:
1.3 is a level of what? that's not decibel level.   70-80-90 is a
level of loudness.

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
> the level is 1.3
> you can call 311
> they can answer that
> or at least you can get moving on trying to get the info
> we - movement building WG - are compiling data on WG contacts so this
> contact information will be available in future
>
> Cari Machet
> NYC 646-436-7795
> carimachet@gmail.com
> AIM carismachet
> Skype carimachet - 646-652-6434
> Syria +963-099 277 3243
> Amman +962 077 636 9407
> Twitter: @carimachet
> dot connector
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Dallas <justdallas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> from
>> http://www.nonoise.org/lawlib/cities/newyork.htm#218
>>
>> seems like it's broad with the "unreasonable" qualifier.   Need to
>> know the decible level.  and have a meter ourselves if amplifying.
>>
>> however, key point in 24-220(b) is that it seems that the noise that
>> is prohibited is also specific to "business" related activity.
>>
>> but if the general prohibition overrides the specifics, then it's the
>> decibel level, I guess.
>>
>> SUBCHAPTER3 PROHIBITED NOISE GENERAL PROHIBITION
>> 24-218 General prohibitions. No person shall make, continue or cause
>> or permit to be made or continued any unreasonable noise, except that
>> this section shall not apply to any sound from any source where the
>> decibel level of such sound is within the limits prescribed by another
>> section of this title and where there is compliance with all other
>> applicable requirements of law with respect to such sound.
>>
>> SUBCHAPTER 4 PROHIBITED NOISE UNREASONABLE NOISE STANDARD
>> 24-220 Sound reproduction devices. (a) Except as provided in section
>> 10.108 of the code, no person shall operate or use or cause to be
>> operated or used any sound reproduction device in such a manner as to
>> create any unreasonable noise.
>> (b) No person shall operate or use or cause to be operated or used any
>> sound reproduction device for commercial or business advertising
>> purposes or for the purpose if attracting attention to any
>> performance, show or sale or display of merchandise, in connection
>> with any commercial or business enterprise
>> [..]
>> Nothing in this section is intended to prohibit incidental sounds
>> emanating from a sporting or entertainment or a public event for which
>> a permit under section 10-108 of the code has been issued.
>>
>>
>> 24-224 Construction activities.
>> (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, no person shall
>> engage in or permit any person to be engaged in construction
>> activities in any zone other than on weekdays between the hours of
>> seven a.m. and six p.m.
>>
>>
>> 24-225 Construction devices. Except as provided in subchapter five of
>> this chapter of this code, no person shall operate or use or cause to
>> operated or used a construction device in such a way as to create an
>> unreasonable noise.
>> 24-226 Containers and construction material.
>> No person shall handle or transport or cause to be handled or
>> transported in any public place, any container or any construction
>> material in such a way as to create an unreasonable noise.
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Dallas <justdallas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > amplified sound?
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:56 AM, walden@riseup.net <walden@riseup.net>
>> > wrote:
>> >> I don't mean to take this thread off topic too much, but we have a
>> >> question about NYC sound ordinances for the radio project. Does anyone
>> >> know how we can contact the legal working group about this? Thanks!
>> >>
>> >> On Nov 9, 7:48 pm, "Michael Premo" <m.pr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> NLG? Legal Working group? Or legel advocates?
>> >>>
>> >>> Michael Premowww.michaelpremo.com
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>> From: Abraham Heisler <a...@abrahamheisler.com>
>> >>>
>> >>> Sender: globalrevolutionmedia@googlegroups.com
>> >>> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 16:44:30
>> >>> To:
>> >>> globalrevolutionmedia@googlegroups.com<globalrevolutionmedia@googlegroups.c
>> >>> om>
>> >>> Reply-To: globalrevolutionmedia@googlegroups.com
>> >>> Subject: [GlobalRevolutionMedia] Legal team contact
>> >>>
>> >>> Anybody have the legal team contact. Legal team in SF needs it.
>> >>> Thanks.
>> >>> Abe
>> >>
>> >
>
>

< PREV INDEX SEARCH NEXT >