i can say what i want to anyone i dont need to clear it with anyone. but here you have an entity assserting basically ip ownership over content where they are supposed be a platform. its like google asserting they own your email...
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Hank Testor <firstname.lastname@example.org>
before you go off bitching at ustream, or anyone else for that
matter, can you please include the collective in the decision
process? otherwise my good friend, i must assume you to be the
unelected leader of our leaderless collective and i will have no
choice but to destroy you ...lol :P seriously though, please
communicate shit to us all before you start firing the cannons.
now, what the F is up with ustream and this shit?
On 11/15/11 7:46 PM, Vlad T wrote:
just to poitn out we will make a policy of not
insering any ustream content from now on ustream and will work
with other groups worldwide to make suire they move off your
i always thought you guys were a little too corporate.... :) lets
see who has more reach - the movement or your marketing finez....
I will be forwarding this to all the occupy people who are using
ustream in the near future.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Vlad T <email@example.com>
hmm do you own the copyright to the images on stufff thats
published on ustream? we will take this up at the next general
assembly if you do.
I'm ccing the occupy wall street media group on this email
since you seemed to have cced a large part of your media team.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:18 PM,
Ruby Tugade <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Intense activity out of NY today.
When Global Revolution is publishing from Ustream,
would you please make sure that our watermark