From:   gail zawacki <>
Sent time:   Tuesday, October 04, 2011 5:00:00 PM
Subject:   Re: [september17discuss] Re: ATTN TWEETERS: Tomorrow's march moved to Foley Square--correct yr info!

I have to say, I agree with Will.  In fact, barricading WS and allowing us to occupy Zuccotti instead of exercise our rights to peacefully demonstrate in a public, not private park, was bad enough.

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:43 PM, hextic <> wrote:
For the benefit of others, I present the text of the 1st amendment.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Where does it say in there that a permit is required?  Where does it
say that I must ask the government's permission politely to disagree
with it?  Nowhere, and through civil disobedience we can put these
"laws" where they belong, a sad note in the history books.

We have a just right to assembly and speech.  If the city wants to
stand in the way of this, let them.  The Constitution trumps city law,
not the other way around.

On Oct 4, 6:35 pm, Conor Tomás Reed <> wrote:
> Hello, OWS twitter-squad. Please update your info tweets to note that the
> mass 4:30pm rally tomorrow at City Hall Park has been moved to Foley Square
> so it can be given a marching permit (i.e. essentially no risk of arrest).
> thanks!
> -Conor