From:   David DeGraw <David@AmpedStatus.com>
Sent time:   Thursday, October 06, 2011 10:01:29 AM
To:   september17@googlegroups.com
Subject:   Re: [september17discuss] American Jobs Act
 

please, please do not endorse the Jobs Act. Highly problematic

legislation. plus we cannot be seen as supporting Obama or partisan in

any way, we facture the whole 99% concept in my opinion.

 

the Press con Obama's is giving right now is the best one I seen in

years. Lots of OWS questions. They asked why he never prosecuted WS

execs. Lots of talk about the American people having every right to be

pissed off.

 

CONGRATS EVERYONE!!! WINNING! ;-)

 

 

On 10/6/2011 11:56 AM, bf0189@gmail.com wrote:

> It strikes me as a heavy bastardization of German's unemployment

> system (and will be more bastardized once it reaches Obama to sign and

> finalize)

>

> Putting a small band-aid over a wound won't fix anything. We need real

> reform.

>

> On , Charles <chcreinhardt@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Hey guys,

> >

> >

> >

> > A thought just occurred to me. I haven't heard much about this yet,

> >

> > but do you think that OWS might do itself a service by endorsing, at

> >

> > least as one of many goals, the passage of the American Jobs Act in

> >

> > its entirety, or even an expansion of its policies (and perhaps a

> >

> > reduction in the ratio of tax cuts composing it)? It has been accepted

> >

> > as a foregone conclusion by the entire American mainstream

> >

> > commentariat that Obama's jobs bill will be absolutely eviscerated or

> >

> > at least highly attenuated by the corrupt legislatures in this

> >

> > country.

> >

> >

> >

> > What if we tried to draw more attention to the legislative battle of

> >

> > the AJA as a pillar of our emerging program (in addition to legal and

> >

> > anti-trust action against the banks and tax reform, etc)? That way the

> >

> > movement can shed light on the very obstacles to the bill's passage or

> >

> > enhancement, which will serve to illuminate the architecture of

> >

> > corruption in our legislative process. That way, the bought off

> >

> > Democrats and Republicans can be named and shamed with the enhanced

> >

> > lens of this movement. Furthermore, the limited scope of the bill

> >

> > itself can serve as grounds for further criticism of the White House

> >

> > approach.

> >

> >

> >

> > I'm sure this has been suggested before, and I understand that there

> >

> > are caveats to our involvement in the political process but I want to

> >

> > know what the status of the current dialogue is about this course of

> >

> > action or line of thinking.

> >

> >

> >

> > Sincerely,

> >

> >

> >

> > Charles Reinhardt

 

< PREV INDEX SEARCH NEXT >