|From:||David DeGraw <David@AmpedStatus.com>|
|Sent time:||Thursday, October 06, 2011 2:41:30 PM|
|Subject:||Re: [september17discuss] Salsa is offering their CRM tool|
no, not a cover at all for demo-process. just trying to guard against
saboteurs - people will try to infiltrate n sabotage - no doubt.
not that we should be paranoid, just careful
On 10/6/2011 4:33 PM, shaista husain wrote:
> HI i would also like to participate in this, i have been collecting
> people's names and working group info, i have several pages here. I
> gave two to someone in internet, no one is getting back to anyone.
> Seems there is too much work to do and serious gaps in our
> organization. I tried to add some working groups to the list as well,
> meeting times, trying to contact group "leaders" or point of contact.
> Yes i have been around OWS since the get go, but just for
> clarification--how much is this lack of trust going to be a cover for
> lack of democratic participation?
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:21 PM,<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Does August 16th count? :-)
>> Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
>> From: David DeGraw<David@AmpedStatus.com>
>> Sender: email@example.com
>> Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:10:32 -0400
>> ReplyTo: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> Subject: Re: [september17discuss] Salsa is offering their CRM tool
>> whoever takes on Salsa / DIA project has to be a 100% trusted 99%er ;-) It
>> would be very dangerous to leave this task to someone who has not been
>> around from the get go
>> On 10/6/2011 3:25 PM, Charles Lenchner wrote:
>> I passed grimwomyn's email address to the salsa folks.
>> I do wonder about something.... there is an 'internet working group' with
>> minutes posted on the nycga site. I've added comments a few times asking
>> about a crm, etc. I offered to help. No one wrote back to me.... which is
>> fine. My wondering is about which working group would be taking ownership of
>> salsa? And what about the possibility that the internet working group is
>> working on something parallel? Or the media working group? Who could we say
>> is 'representing' OWS in all matters pertaining to CRM usage?
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:17 PM, David DeGraw<David@ampedstatus.com> wrote:
>>> just saw this, inbox a mess. We have used Salsa / DIA since they first
>>> launched. It would be an excellent tool to create a mailing list and a
>>> petition-like way of taking in online votes for demands and other actions.
>>> This would be a VITAL tool. who can make sure it happens?
>>> On 10/5/2011 3:40 PM, Charles Lenchner wrote:
>>> Hey all...
>>> I just joined the list and plan to introduce myself. But I learned
>>> something and wanted to get it in the right hands - it's unclear what that
>>> Salsa is a Constituent Relationship Manager. It is used by political
>>> groups and nonprofits on the progressive side of the fence. They would like
>>> to offer use if this product to Occupy Wall Street for free. It's a great
>>> tool that I'm familiar with - it does email blasting, list building,
>>> integrates with fundraising pages, signups, advocacy actions, letters to the
>>> editor, events management, etc.
>>> Folks might have various opinions about using this. My question is: which
>>> group or committee is qualified to make a decision on such a thing on behalf
>>> of 'Occupy Wall Street'?
>>> I beg forgiveness if this was discussed previously - the NYCGA site didn't
>>> include any mention of it that I could find, so it seemed a bit like an
>>> orphan issue.
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> Charles Lenchner
|< PREV||INDEX||SEARCH||NEXT >|