From:   guindave@aol.com
Sent time:   Tuesday, October 11, 2011 9:16:41 AM
To:   guindave@aol.com; september17@googlegroups.com
Subject:   RE: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who want no demands bridging the gap
 

and yes it worries me for the same reason but what to do now ?

 

-----Original Message-----

From: guindave <guindave@aol.com>

To: september17 <september17@googlegroups.com>

Sent: Tue, Oct 11, 2011 11:15 am

Subject: RE: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who want

no demands bridging the gap

 

They where already there

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Jackie DiSalvo <jdisalvo@nyc.rr.com>

To: september17 <september17@googlegroups.com>

Sent: Tue, Oct 11, 2011 7:33 am

Subject: RE: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who want

no demands bridging the gap

 

Don't have reporters; they will slant coverage to suit their

publication's

agenda.

 

-----Original Message-----

 From: september17@googlegroups.com

[mailto:september17@googlegroups.com] On

Behalf Of guindave@aol.com

Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 10:47 PM

To: september17@googlegroups.com

Subject: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who want no

demands bridging the gap

 

I was at the demands committee and tonight (as some one who myself

would like something like a demand (perhaps not in those words). They

where completely unaware that many at the GA don't want demands I

would urge pretty much every one who is interested for and against

demands to come to there next meeting Sunday at 2 but with and open

mind towards perhaps trying to bridge the gap between those who do and

don't want this and those who are writing the what is it a constitution

? and those who do to find middle ground. Also there where some

reporters there do other working groups have reporters at them ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

< PREV INDEX SEARCH NEXT >