From:   David DeGraw <David@AmpedStatus.com>
Sent time:   Tuesday, October 11, 2011 9:31:31 AM
To:   september17@googlegroups.com
Subject:   Re: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who want no demands bridging the gap
 

this mysterious "demands committee" needs to have total transparency.

if demands come out of left field there will be a revolt within the

revolt. we are already working hard to deflect all sorts of wacky

conspiracy theories.

 

On 10/11/2011 11:16 AM, guindave@aol.com wrote:

> and yes it worries me for the same reason but what to do now ?

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: guindave <guindave@aol.com>

> To: september17 <september17@googlegroups.com>

> Sent: Tue, Oct 11, 2011 11:15 am

> Subject: RE: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who want

> no demands bridging the gap

>

> They where already there

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Jackie DiSalvo <jdisalvo@nyc.rr.com>

> To: september17 <september17@googlegroups.com>

> Sent: Tue, Oct 11, 2011 7:33 am

> Subject: RE: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who want

> no demands bridging the gap

>

> Don't have reporters; they will slant coverage to suit their

> publication's

> agenda.

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: september17@googlegroups.com

> [mailto:september17@googlegroups.com] On

> Behalf Of guindave@aol.com

> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 10:47 PM

> To: september17@googlegroups.com

> Subject: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who want no

> demands bridging the gap

>

> I was at the demands committee and tonight (as some one who myself

> would like something like a demand (perhaps not in those words). They

> where completely unaware that many at the GA don't want demands I

> would urge pretty much every one who is interested for and against

> demands to come to there next meeting Sunday at 2 but with and open

> mind towards perhaps trying to bridge the gap between those who do and

> don't want this and those who are writing the what is it a constitution

> ? and those who do to find middle ground. Also there where some

> reporters there do other working groups have reporters at them ?

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

 

< PREV INDEX SEARCH NEXT >