From:   guindave@aol.com
Sent time:   Tuesday, October 11, 2011 10:41:43 AM
To:   september17@googlegroups.com
Subject:   Re: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who want no demands bridging the gap
 

I'm not sure who is writting it I think thats what they are doing right

? writting somthing like it ?

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Will Gauss <willgauss@gmail.com>

To: september17 <september17@googlegroups.com>

Sent: Tue, Oct 11, 2011 11:54 am

Subject: Re: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who want

no demands bridging the gap

 

We are a consensus based group. If a decision is made which does not

include us, I just won't recognize it.

 

Sent from my iPhone

 

On Oct 11, 2011, at 11:31 AM, David DeGraw <David@AmpedStatus.com>

wrote:

 

> this mysterious "demands committee" needs to have total transparency.

  if demands come out of left field there will be a revolt within the

revolt. we are already working hard to deflect all sorts of wacky

conspiracy theories.

>

> On 10/11/2011 11:16 AM, guindave@aol.com wrote:

>> and yes it worries me for the same reason but what to do now ?

>>

>> -----Original Message-----

>> From: guindave <guindave@aol.com>

>> To: september17 <september17@googlegroups.com>

>> Sent: Tue, Oct 11, 2011 11:15 am

>> Subject: RE: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who

want no demands bridging the gap

>>

>> They where already there

>>

>> -----Original Message-----

>> From: Jackie DiSalvo <jdisalvo@nyc.rr.com>

>> To: september17 <september17@googlegroups.com>

>> Sent: Tue, Oct 11, 2011 7:33 am

>> Subject: RE: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who

want

>> no demands bridging the gap

>>

>> Don't have reporters; they will slant coverage to suit their

>> publication's

>> agenda.

>>

>> -----Original Message-----

>> From: september17@googlegroups.com

>> [mailto:september17@googlegroups.com] On

>> Behalf Of guindave@aol.com

>> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 10:47 PM

>> To: september17@googlegroups.com

>> Subject: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who want no

>> demands bridging the gap

>>

>> I was at the demands committee and tonight (as some one who myself

>> would like something like a demand (perhaps not in those words). They

>> where completely unaware that many at the GA don't want demands I

>> would urge pretty much every one who is interested for and against

>> demands to come to there next meeting Sunday at 2 but with and open

>> mind towards perhaps trying to bridge the gap between those who do

and

>> don't want this and those who are writing the what is it a

constitution

>> ? and those who do to find middle ground. Also there where some

>> reporters there do other working groups have reporters at them ?

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>

 

 

 

< PREV INDEX SEARCH NEXT >