|Sent time:||Tuesday, October 11, 2011 5:48:38 PM|
|Subject:||Re: Re: [september17discuss] OWS online presence|
i thought we were going w/ no "official" website - leaderless,decentralized, right? of course http://nycga.cc ,OccupyWallSt.org and OccupyTogether pull most traffic n have ton ofstreet cred tho
On 10/11/2011 12:08 AM, email@example.com wrote:occupywallst.org has always seemed helpful but the officialwebsite is nycga.cc This is an important issue that needs to be workedoutOn10/10/11, Winter Siroco<firstname.lastname@example.org>wrote:Actuallyyou are bringing a very interesting question. I just heard that occupywallst.org isjust a group of 4 individuals who do not necessarily respond to OWS. Ifthat is true it is an untenable situation, and perhaps the reason ofthe unresponsiveness that I have also heard in many corners of theplaza. OWS should have direct online presence, with a LOT of workingunemployed people, not a somehow "friendly" entity of a few peoplewilling or not willing to post content.Cesar
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Snafu <email@example.com>wrote:
I agree with Beka, the site of the GA should be more visible from occupywallst.org.As of now, there is the tab NYCGA, but it is rather cryptic and I don'tthink it draws much attention/traffic.
Why don't we add a link on the right-hand column, right below theWhere, Help&Directions, etc that says something like
"New York City General Assembly: Working Groups, Minutes, and OfficialDeclarations."
It would also make a lot of sense to set up Working Groups lists (e.g.sept17-outreach@...) that can be easily accessed from the NYCGA website.
On 10/8/11 12:27 PM, beka economopoulos wrote:Where do we post minutes? I know they go on thissite: http://nycga.cc,I think most people don't know about this website, I don't see itlinked to from OccupyWallSt.org, and don't see instructions on thenycga.cc site on where to email or post notes.Is there a listserv for working group checkins andcoordination, and mtg minutes? Is this the one? Seems like listthis is more for discussion rather than working business. Does itmakes sense to have separate Sept17-discuss and Sept17-WG lists?Thanks, and apologies if this is the wrong forum.Best,Beka--
New: http://blog.art21.org/2011/05/19/5-questions-for-contemporary-practice-with-not-an-alternative/Not An Alternative
|< PREV||INDEX||SEARCH||NEXT >|