From:   guindave@aol.com
Sent time:   Wednesday, October 12, 2011 8:55:22 AM
To:   september17@googlegroups.com
Subject:   Re: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who want no demands bridging the gap
 

I think the Demands committie and the Constitution Committee should

become one who is making this constitution do you know any one ?

 

again however the demands committee meeting is sunday at 2pm by the red

cube All from all sides please come they don't have an idea how diverse

opnion is on this.

 

Dave

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Snafu <snafu@thething.it>

To: september17 <september17@googlegroups.com>

Sent: Tue, Oct 11, 2011 2:26 pm

Subject: Re: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who want

no demands bridging the gap

 

It's interesting that the Demands Committee creates so much alarm

whereas the Constitution Committee does not even raise an eyebrow.

Constitution is strategic, demands are tactical.

 

Demands do not define a movement, a constitution does.

 

On 10/11/11 12:45 PM, Marisa Holmes wrote:

> I agree with Will. We cannot represent the movement as a whole.

> Also, a demands committee would not represent the NY occupation.

> Any political statements must go through the GA process.

> Personally, I'm against having demands at all.

> We've already adopted principles of solidarity and a declaration.

> We know what we're about at the NYC GA without "demands"

>

> Marisa

>

>

> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:41 PM,<guindave@aol.com> wrote:

>> I'm not sure who is writting it I think thats what they are doing

right ?

>> writting somthing like it ?

>>

>> -----Original Message-----

>> From: Will Gauss<willgauss@gmail.com>

>> To: september17<september17@googlegroups.com>

>> Sent: Tue, Oct 11, 2011 11:54 am

>> Subject: Re: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who

want no

>> demands bridging the gap

>>

>> We are a consensus based group. If a decision is made which does not

>> include us, I just won't recognize it.

>>

>> Sent from my iPhone

>>

>> On Oct 11, 2011, at 11:31 AM, David DeGraw<David@AmpedStatus.com>

wrote:

>>

>>> this mysterious "demands committee" needs to have total

transparency.

>> if demands come out of left field there will be a revolt within

the revolt.

>> we are already working hard to deflect all sorts of wacky

conspiracy

>> theories.

>>> On 10/11/2011 11:16 AM, guindave@aol.com wrote:

>>>> and yes it worries me for the same reason but what to do now ?

>>>>

>>>> -----Original Message-----

>>>> From: guindave<guindave@aol.com>

>>>> To: september17<september17@googlegroups.com>

>>>> Sent: Tue, Oct 11, 2011 11:15 am

>>>> Subject: RE: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who

>> want no demands bridging the gap

>>>> They where already there

>>>>

>>>> -----Original Message-----

>>>> From: Jackie DiSalvo<jdisalvo@nyc.rr.com>

>>>> To: september17<september17@googlegroups.com>

>>>> Sent: Tue, Oct 11, 2011 7:33 am

>>>> Subject: RE: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who

>> want

>>>> no demands bridging the gap

>>>>

>>>> Don't have reporters; they will slant coverage to suit their

>>>> publication's

>>>> agenda.

>>>>

>>>> -----Original Message-----

>>>> From: september17@googlegroups.com

>>>> [mailto:september17@googlegroups.com] On

>>>> Behalf Of guindave@aol.com

>>>> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 10:47 PM

>>>> To: september17@googlegroups.com

>>>> Subject: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who want

no

>>>> demands bridging the gap

>>>>

>>>> I was at the demands committee and tonight (as some one who myself

>>>> would like something like a demand (perhaps not in those words).

They

>>>> where completely unaware that many at the GA don't want demands I

>>>> would urge pretty much every one who is interested for and against

>>>> demands to come to there next meeting Sunday at 2 but with and open

>>>> mind towards perhaps trying to bridge the gap between those who do

>> and

>>>> don't want this and those who are writing the what is it a

>> constitution

>>>> ? and those who do to find middle ground. Also there where some

>>>> reporters there do other working groups have reporters at them ?

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>

>>

>>

 

 

 

 

< PREV INDEX SEARCH NEXT >