|From:||Jon Good <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Sent time:||Friday, October 14, 2011 8:43:46 AM|
|Subject:||Re: [september17discuss] Brookfield Properties|
I don't agree with thanking Brookfield publicly or privately but I really think we should thank all of our allies and supporters that mobilized to the park to defend last night and this morning.In solidarity,LisaOn Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Robert Christ <email@example.com> wrote:
It could be private. Anything we can do to "better relations" without hurting public image.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Justin Wedes <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Propose it to the general assembly, but my gut feeling is we dont need to publicly thank Brookfield for so *graciously* allowing us to be in the public park they "own/operate".
Educator & Activist
will you #occupy?
On Oct 14, 2011, at 10:28 AM, Robert Christ <email@example.com> wrote:
> So politico is reporting that brookfield properties has withdrawn their cleaning schedule for the day. If this turns out to be true, I think we should really organize thank you letters, and make sure our sanitation team is in direct contact with their people. Maybe the Outreach Working group could make such a proposal at the GA?
> Can't hurt to try to make an ally of these people, especially since the Mayor still seems to be itching to get us out.
|< PREV||INDEX||SEARCH||NEXT >|