From:   guindave@aol.com
Sent time:   Friday, October 14, 2011 9:42:51 PM
To:   september17@googlegroups.com
Subject:   SPAM-MED: Re: Re: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who want no demands bridging the gap
 

Letting you know its now 6pm on sunday not 2pm near the cube

 

-----Original Message-----

From: jemcgloin <jemcgloin@verizon.net>

To: september17 <september17@googlegroups.com>

Sent: Tue, Oct 11, 2011 9:03 pm

Subject: Re: Re: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those who

want no demands bridging the gap

 

I am actually alarmed to find out we are making a constitution.  It

seems extremely premature.  I am alarmed that the demands committees

are extremely hard to find and that the constitution committee also

seems to be operating in the dark.

 

 

 

 

On 10/11/11, Snafu&lt;snafu@thething.it&gt; wrote:It's interesting that

the Demands Committee creates so much alarm

whereas the Constitution Committee does not even raise an eyebrow.

Constitution is strategic, demands are tactical.

 

Demands do not define a movement, a constitution does.

 

On 10/11/11 12:45 PM, Marisa Holmes wrote:

&gt; I agree with Will. We cannot represent the movement as a whole.

&gt; Also, a demands committee would not represent the NY occupation.

&gt; Any political statements must go through the GA process.

&gt; Personally, I'm against having demands at all.

&gt; We've already adopted principles of solidarity and a declaration.

&gt; We know what we're about at the NYC GA without "demands"

&gt;

&gt; Marisa

&gt;

&gt;

&gt; On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:41 PM,&lt;guindave@aol.com&gt; wrote:

&gt;&gt; I'm not sure who is writting it I think thats what they are

doing right ?

&gt;&gt; writting somthing like it ?

&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt; -----Original Message-----

&gt;&gt; From: Will Gauss&lt;willgauss@gmail.com&gt;

&gt;&gt; To: september17&lt;september17@googlegroups.com&gt;

&gt;&gt; Sent: Tue, Oct 11, 2011 11:54 am

&gt;&gt; Subject: Re: [september17discuss] Demands committee and those

who want no

&gt;&gt; demands bridging the gap

&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt; We are a consensus based group. If a decision is made which

does not

&gt;&gt; include us, I just won't recognize it.

&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt; Sent from my iPhone

&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt; On Oct 11, 2011, at 11:31 AM, David

DeGraw&lt;David@AmpedStatus.com&gt; wrote:

&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt; this mysterious "demands committee" needs to have total

transparency.

&gt;&gt; if demands come out of left field there will be a revolt

within the revolt.

&gt;&gt; we are already working hard to deflect all sorts of wacky

conspiracy

&gt;&gt; theories.

&gt;&gt;&gt; On 10/11/2011 11:16 AM, guindave@aol.com wrote:

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; and yes it worries me for the same reason but what to

do now ?

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; -----Original Message-----

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; From: guindave&lt;guindave@aol.com&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; To: september17&lt;september17@googlegroups.com&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Sent: Tue, Oct 11, 2011 11:15 am

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Subject: RE: [september17discuss] Demands committee

and those who

&gt;&gt; want no demands bridging the gap

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; They where already there

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; -----Original Message-----

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; From: Jackie DiSalvo&lt;jdisalvo@nyc.rr.com&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; To: september17&lt;september17@googlegroups.com&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Sent: Tue, Oct 11, 2011 7:33 am

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Subject: RE: [september17discuss] Demands committee

and those who

&gt;&gt; want

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; no demands bridging the gap

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Don't have reporters; they will slant coverage to suit

their

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; publication's

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; agenda.

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; -----Original Message-----

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; From: september17@googlegroups.com

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; [mailto:september17@googlegroups.com] On

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Behalf Of guindave@aol.com

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 10:47 PM

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; To: september17@googlegroups.com

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Subject: [september17discuss] Demands committee and

those who want no

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; demands bridging the gap

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; I was at the demands committee and tonight (as some

one who myself

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; would like something like a demand (perhaps not in

those words). They

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; where completely unaware that many at the GA don't

want demands I

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; would urge pretty much every one who is interested for

and against

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; demands to come to there next meeting Sunday at 2 but

with and open

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; mind towards perhaps trying to bridge the gap between

those who do

&gt;&gt; and

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; don't want this and those who are writing the what is

it a

&gt;&gt; constitution

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; ? and those who do to find middle ground. Also there

where some

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; reporters there do other working groups have reporters

at them ?

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt;

&gt;&gt;

 

 

< PREV INDEX SEARCH NEXT >