From:   Jackie DiSalvo <jdisalvo@nyc.rr.com>
Sent time:   Sunday, October 16, 2011 10:07:58 PM
To:   september17@googlegroups.com
Subject:   RE: [september17discuss] ny times article
 

The GA passed a resolution disassociating itself from any demands since they

were not passed by the GA. The Times article is now online and mostly covers

the controversy around having demands and mentions the two areas agreed upon

in the working group. You're not mentioned, David.

 

-----Original Message-----

From: september17@googlegroups.com [mailto:september17@googlegroups.com] On

Behalf Of guindave@aol.com

Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 11:56 PM

To: september17@googlegroups.com

Subject: [september17discuss] ny times article

 

Hey so there will be one coming out tomorrow based ont eh demands

committie i'm in very nearvous since i'm am not 100% pro demands but i

guess will see how they paint me i tried to tell them, i was also leary

of there presence at our meeting last week o well f it i guess will see

 

 

 

 

< PREV INDEX SEARCH NEXT >