|Sent time:||Tuesday, October 18, 2011 2:17:31 PM|
|Cc:||email@example.com; chris de ville <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Subject:||[GlobalRevolutionMedia] Re: [OWS PR] Re: Please make an important correction!|
This should be on the agenda to be discussed/assigned at tonights 5pm media WG meeting.
What has been suggested is that we track down 2-3 folks who were directly involved in the various bank actions, interview them and either film the interview and intercut the story this way or just show the videos w/ VO - in both cases the goal would be to provide context to the events.
I prefer the interviews being intercut as it humanizes the action but this is more involved and it is up to the media WG to decide.
If you have any contact info for folks who were involved and would be strong interview subjects please send me details or have them contact me.
Sent from my Star Trek like, mobile communication device, which is destroying language.
That's why I linked you with the folks who got arrested at citibank email and ask for clarification if you're doing the piece.
From: Fix <email@example.com>Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:19:27 -0400ReplyTo: firstname.lastname@example.orgCc: chris de ville<email@example.com>Subject: Re: [OWS PR] Re: Please make an important correction!
We need to clarify what happened at each action - I understood that there were at least two bank actions on Saturday. Someone from direct action WG can hopefully help provide details.
Sent from my Star Trek like, mobile communication device, which is destroying language.On Oct 18, 2011 11:47 AM, "Press" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Thanks for spotting this. Going to forward along to our media, internet, and press teams.
PR TeamOccupy Wall Street: www.occupywallst.orgNew York General Assembly: http://nycga.cc/
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:43 AM, chris de ville <email@example.com> wrote:
I'm an OWS supporter and frequent 99% demonstration participant. I am very concerned that by (accidentally?) mis-reporting about the arrests in the Citibank this past Saturday that we are doing great harm to our cause.
Occupywallst.org reports that people were arrested "while attempting to withdraw their accounts". This suggests that they were arrested for trying to close their accounts, when in fact they were arrested for a mildly disruptive act if civil disobedience (disrupting business by commanding the attention of the bank employees and customers and making long impassioned speeches). Watch the video here:
I have been arguing our cause to many, many fence-sitters, and have seen first-hand how this kind of misrepresentation alienates those would-be supporters. Two of my friends contacted me after seeing this video (which only shows a woman being wrongfully arrested outside the Citibank):
Since occupywallst.org was echoing the same sentiment (that non-disruptive protesters were being arrested for closing their accounts), I believed your reporting and explained to my friends that yes, indeed, this is what happened. Later on, after further research I found that other video, the one shot inside the bank, and I realized that the protesters were arrested for other reasons. (Whether those reasons are right or wrong is not relevant here; the issue at hand is the accuracy of our reporting). I contacted my friends, apologized for the error and for accidentally misleading them.
Imagine this quite likely scenario: A right-wing Fox News program shows occupywallst.org's claim that the protesters were arrested "while trying to close their accounts" and then they follow it up with clips of the civil-disobedience occurring inside the bank. They'd call us out as liars, and they'd be right. How many millions if fence sitting viewers would start to see us as no better than any other spinning, misrepresenting media outlet?
The good thing is that the fix us EASY and TOTALLY EFFECTIVE. Simply post a one-line correction on occupywallst.org. If we do it before our opponents do (and they surely will) then we are beyond reproach. If we don't make thus correction, and make it fast, we're going to spend a hell of a lot of energy defending ourselves from accusations of being liars: energy much better spent building the movement.
Chris de Ville
|< PREV||INDEX||SEARCH||NEXT >|