"To Gail Zawacki: Your conclusion that I have used the knowledge of
the rape of another human to discredit your movement is correct.
However, by saying you "resent" my original post suggests my
intentions are insensitive to the victim. This, you have based on the
assumption that I have not lived a modern life, that I have never
known or cared for a woman who has been a victim, that I am one-
dimensional and that I fit neatly into your definition of the
opposition. Shame on you for shooting the messenger and not the
No, I'm only suggesting that I think it is disgusting that you are using the rape of a woman to discredit people who had nothing to do with it, cynically. Shame on YOU, you disgusting ingrate. No person who has been raped wants to be used as a poster child for someone with an agenda, and yours is clear, to discredit OWS. And by the way, knowing and caring for someone who has been raped (which I sincerely doubt describes you) is about as close to being raped as living on the moon is to living on earth.
I being a nonviolent person would never hurt you, just because you are a fuc*ing asshole. But given the chance I'm afraid I WOULD spit on you.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:29 PM, J.A. Myerson <email@example.com>
I also did. I tweeted, "Fuck this. I want this dude, if he did it, locked under the jail."
Also, you're being a dick, Deadfish. Both things can be true.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Lauren <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Do you need a ladder to step off this cross?
I commented on the rape. It was the actions of a man, not of the
movement. Anything else in your bullshit is predicated on this