|From:||shaista husain <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Sent time:||Sunday, October 30, 2011 9:50:27 AM|
|Subject:||Re: [september17discuss] Winter Prep Operations Group|
Thank you, Mathew! I agree it should be clustered from--medic,
comfort, saferspaces, security and coordinate with finance--so money
I second the indoor additional site, we can't depend on a list of
folks for last minute emergency evacuations--that can only go so far.
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Matthew Presto
> To prevent a repeat of yesterday, a specific operations group (to use the
> terminology of the recently passed structure proposal) should be formed with
> the intention of working on winter preparedness. Unless I'm mistaken, this
> group does not exist, and so perhaps it was assumed the some group or
> another would take on this responsibility, which is perhaps why not as much
> was done beforehand as could have been.
> Some things this group could do:
> Obtain winter supplies, working in conjunction with Comfort
> Scout out possible indoor locations for an occupation site, working in
> conjunction with Direct Action. Perhaps also up for discussion is how
> important we consider it to keep Liberty Square. Would an indoor location,
> if feasible, serve as an additional site, or replacement of the current one?
> Coordinate smaller off-site locations for people to sleep for a given night
> (e.g. organizing a list of folks willing to offer up floorspace at their
> Please let me know if what I'm suggesting is redundant to what's already
> going on. It's just that it seems like if these tasks are not designated to
> a specific operations group, it may fall by the wayside. Thoughts?
|< PREV||INDEX||SEARCH||NEXT >|