It is counterproductive to air petty internal issues when you have an opportunity to speak to thousands of people who may join the actions.
++++++++ to all the other points raised about the importance of solidarity.
Use the press to tell a positive story about our movement or if you want to be negative... Speak about wall street and what it does to people!
On Friday, September 16, 2011, Drew Hornbein <email@example.com
> It might not be the most flattering article but it feels about right. I don't think Will said anything untrue, nor did he speak FOR the GA. imho.
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Lorenzo Serna <firstname.lastname@example.org
> +alot to all
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:59 AM, jason ahmadi <email@example.com
> Dear all,
> its best not to answer the questions that press pose. always always always stick to talking points. acknowledge questions, but then always go back to the talking points. there is a reason politicians do this and we should filter what we say to the media so our words can no be twisted or used against us.
> also, its valid that you hold your opinions but do not share these with the press. the people you should share these opinions with are YOUR FELLOW ORGANIZERS. if you do not feel safe telling us who are your friends, then tell confide with a close friend that you trust but never the press.
> Peace and Love,
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:45 AM, David Graeber <firstname.lastname@example.org
> though to be honest the comments weren't all that insulting
> still, best to just put in the positive parts
> On Sep 16, 2011, at 1:30 AM, David Graeber wrote:
>> yes, I would strongly second that part about the insulting comments. Not badmouthing other activists
>> in the press includes in the comment section!
>> On Sep 16, 2011, at 12:21 AM, Will wrote:
>>> Hey all, I just posted the comment below in response to the article
>>> that came out earlier today. I just want to add to this that while I
>>> was having this conversation with the reporter I did not realize that
>>> she was going to transcribe everything I said at that part. I thought
>>> it was going to be a column article and not an interview until after
>>> it was done. Also, she began the conversation with 'I hear there are
>>> a lot of anarchists involved,' which doesn't show in the article and
>>> makes it look like I brought up the topic myself. I'd like to point
>>> out that I didn't name any names. That being said this was my first
>>> time talking to the press and I pretty well botched it.
>>> The insulting comments about me posted to the article are not
>>> helpful. If you have anything else negative you'd like to add I would
>>> appreciate it if you posted it here, rather than making this any worse
>>> than it already was. I will see it.
>>> I'll let the post speak for itself, but again if you have any more
>>> comments please let me know.
>>> Hey People, especially those from the GA,
>>> I just wanted to clarify a few things from the article which came out
>>> earlier today. After reading it, I think the tone of it came out way
>>> too pessimistic regarding the GA and S17. More importantly, I didn't
>>> mean or expect for things to sound so much against certain tendencies
>>> within the GA, especially since nearly everyone involved has been such
>>> a pleasure to organize with. I have an enormous amount of respect for
>>> these individuals from the GA both as people and as organizers, even
>>> if there are some political differences between us. In the end I
>>> believe we share common goals, which is why I value our relationships
>>> and the importance of us working together.
>>> While I do stand by arguments I made, I recognize that the Voice was
>>> not the best place to air some of these differences, particularly the
>>> one about liaisons, which was inappropriate for me to talk about with
>>> a reporter. If I had fully understood the format of the article which
>>> was to be written, I would have refrained from discussing several of
>>> these issues and instead have focused on the more logistical issues
>>> around S17 and its promotion.
>>> I would also like to c