From:   Gabriel Johnson <gabjoh2@gmail.com>
Sent time:   Friday, September 23, 2011 11:18:25 AM
To:   september17@googlegroups.com
Subject:   Re: [september17discuss] Re: Does everyone know about this "counter protest?"
 

(Also NONE OF THEM are getting my ironic wall post. I *will* bring

deodorant if I can, however.)

 

--glj

 

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Gabriel Johnson <gabjoh2@gmail.com> wrote:

> Can there be a spare cheap suit for me? (Or at least a pair of slacks?)

>

> --glj

>

> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Harrison Schultz <schuh072@gmail.com> wrote:

>> I'm feeling what you're writing Justin!

>> H.

>>

>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Justin Wedes <jwedes@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>

>>> also, can u send me your # and i'll call u now

>>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 12:31 PM, grimwomyn wrote:

>>>

>>> I know-- I was thinking something like "too ostentatious for occupation"

>>>

>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Justin Wedes <jwedes@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>

>>>> All the better if it's real and we join in pretending to be real.

>>>> It sounds counterintuitive, but this is exactly the kind of thing that we

>>>> can turn into a great video for OUR CAUSE if we do it convincingly - play

>>>> the role.

>>>> Think Billionaires for Bush.

>>>> -j

>>>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 12:28 PM, grimwomyn wrote:

>>>>

>>>> This is a real counter protest the guy has been trying to delete all the

>>>> pro-OWS comments but they are now coming in too fast and furious for him to

>>>> keep up with at his trading desk.

>>>>

>>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Justin Wedes <jwedes@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>> I guess I'm confused about our intent here:

>>>>> Whether or not we know if this is a real counter-protest - it may be

>>>>> staged by our supporters as street theatre - our approach should be to come

>>>>> with NON-ALCHOHOLIC drinks like sparkling apple juice or even just a bottle

>>>>> that doesn't look like an alcohol bottle if you're scared.

>>>>> My vision here is to augment the size and optics of this

>>>>> "counter-protest" to film a really fun video about all these "pro-wall

>>>>> street" folks in absurd celebration.

>>>>> If people feel this would be done more effectively in conjunction with

>>>>> the police, making them aware of our intentions, all the better. it doesn't

>>>>> really matter for the video as long as we get in.

>>>>> -justin

>>>>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Harrison Schultz wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>> I just confirmed with my contact at the Lawyers Guild that an open

>>>>> container is arrest-able, and should include a summons.  He encouraged us to

>>>>> take pictures and mock them and the police especially if they don't do their

>>>>> jobs.  I lost my number for the legal observers but it might be good to have

>>>>> them around as well, I'll call them them if someone hooks me up with their

>>>>> digits.  Good call on the juice!

>>>>> H.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:13 PM, grimwomyn <grimwomyn@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>> yes sparkling apple juice!

>>>>>>

>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Justin Wedes <jwedes@gmail.com>

>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Yes, record!

>>>>>>> And use sparkling apple juice not alcohol to avoid legal probs.

>>>>>>> CC'ing Kira.annika@gmail.com , who's on the ground at media center, to

>>>>>>> help coordinate. i should be back from nyu by then. will try to get yes men

>>>>>>> to join action too, in suits.

>>>>>>> who's point person to coordinate everything?

>>>>>>> -j

>>>>>>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Harrison Schultz wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Grim this score is a goldmine! I'll try to get off work early for

>>>>>>> this.  I'll try to get some cheap champagne too if I have some time, if they

>>>>>>> don't get arrested, we should pull our stuff out, see what happens, and

>>>>>>> record it...

>>>>>>> Awesome!

>>>>>>> H.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:44 AM, grimwomyn <grimwomyn@gmail.com>

>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> terrific-- see you in business casual my friend

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Justin Wedes <jwedes@gmail.com>

>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> it would be a shame if we didn't get into suits and co-opt this

>>>>>>>>> action (if it isn't ours already).

>>>>>>>>> this might be the easiest wall to get onto wall street this

>>>>>>>>> afternoon!

>>>>>>>>> who's game? i'm at nyu right now spreading the word with the yes men

>>>>>>>>> about our camp, so can't coordinate.

>>>>>>>>> just one thing: let's not set this up as a confrontation. maybe have

>>>>>>>>> a few dressed-up "hippies" there to stoke the fire, but emphasis should be

>>>>>>>>> on the counter-protest

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> -j

>>>>>>>>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 10:49 AM, grimwomyn wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> yeah-- it takes all types in this world.... sorry to hear it... stay

>>>>>>>>> strong this wont be the last nasty comment that is sent, spoken, shouted, or

>>>>>>>>> broadcast.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:40 AM, gail zawacki <witsendnj@gmail.com>

>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> My guess is no one will be there.  It's just a stupid joke.  Look

>>>>>>>>>> at the nasty comment I got on my blog post about Mariel Moshiri.  I won't

>>>>>>>>>> let it through moderation because her mother says she's really depressed and

>>>>>>>>>> it might upset her more.  I don't want her to see it.  The mere fact some

>>>>>>>>>> random person took the time to write at this length is disturbing:

>>>>>>>>>> Well Gail won't post my other comment. Apparently she's not as big

>>>>>>>>>> of a fan of free speech as she would purport. Maybe she'll send this on to

>>>>>>>>>> you though Mariel.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> The clip clearly shows you swearing like a drunken sailor,

>>>>>>>>>> threatening to sue right from the get go. The language continues on here. If

>>>>>>>>>> you get confrontational with a cop in a potentially volatile situation you

>>>>>>>>>> run the risk of being arrested. I'm glad you cooperated once at the station,

>>>>>>>>>> apparently the fact that they didn't let you go simply because you swore at

>>>>>>>>>> them and told them you would sue must have made you realize it was time to

>>>>>>>>>> wise up.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> I'm sure you hate the system that we have set up in America but you

>>>>>>>>>> seem very ready to use that system to sue the NYPD for all that they have.

>>>>>>>>>> Good luck with that, your top 10% IQ clearly doesn't allow for

>>>>>>>>>> self-reflection as if you see the hypocrite that you are.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> A cop screamed you were suicidal? I will 100% guarantee that did

>>>>>>>>>> not happen. Possibly in your head but not in reality. You didn't know where

>>>>>>>>>> you were? Well that will happen on your big day out in the big city where

>>>>>>>>>> you act in a way where the police have end up placing you in custody.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> NYPD is a great department. A lot of them died in the towers that

>>>>>>>>>> used to cast a shadow over the area where you were arrested. Whatever you

>>>>>>>>>> think the reason was for that day those people that died were just working

>>>>>>>>>> stiffs trying to get home to their families that day and it didn't happen.

>>>>>>>>>> They try to do that everyday and make a real impact on people and this

>>>>>>>>>> world. Not a paper impact like you and your merry band of protesters made

>>>>>>>>>> the other day. The reason they detained you was to help insure that they

>>>>>>>>>> made it home that day as well. Remember that in the future as you exercise

>>>>>>>>>> the rights provided to you by this American system, flaws and all, act with

>>>>>>>>>> the decency expected of our citizens and you'll make it home yourself at the

>>>>>>>>>> end of the night with your dignity and soundness of mind in tact.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Lauren <celliwig@gmail.com>

>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> I honestly doubt there will be more than a dozen people. If there

>>>>>>>>>>> were

>>>>>>>>>>> more, at least, I'd take it as an opportunity for education.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>>

>>

>>

>

< PREV INDEX SEARCH NEXT >