From:   Matthew Bralow <mbralow@gmail.com>
Sent time:   Sunday, September 25, 2011 8:30:30 PM
To:   september17@googlegroups.com
Subject:   Re: [september17discuss] YouTube Status?
 

that rocks! you're right, it's not cheap! (and now people can watch

on MOBILE devices!... http://m.livestream.com from a smartphone

browser

 

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 6:04 PM, M C <tebefoto@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Woo hoo great news!!

> I felt uncomfortable too, having to watch american express commercial before

> every video on 'global revolution' channel.

> And premium account on livestream is quite not cheap, so this is totally

> great news!

>

> Maria

> ________________________________

> From: Justin Wedes <jwedes@gmail.com>

> To: "september17@googlegroups.com" <september17@googlegroups.com>

> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:36 PM

> Subject: Re: [september17discuss] YouTube Status?

>

> Just FYI-

> Livestream sent an email today saying they were upgrading us to premium at

> no charge. Said ad providers felt uncomfortable about the content.

> Something 2 keep in mind w advertising

>

> Justin Wedes

> Activist & Educator, Brooklyn

> Use your voice!

> Web: www.OurSchoolsNYC.org

> Twitter: NYCPubSchooler

> ~

> There's something going on in the Islands... Check it out at

> USUncut.org/yeslab

> ~

> On Sep 22, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Harrison Schultz <schuh072@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> Sounds good Drew,

> Micah,

> We'll get it before the GA for discussion because I happen to think its a

> good idea,

> I would also point out that you pointed out earlier today I believe that

> that radicals around the world have been funding us and that the money will

> eventually run out.  Monetizing YouTube content is one way to help make this

> occupation financially autonomous.  Recycling our message and using it to

> feed people here seems like a good idea to me and to those of my comrades

> I've suggested it to.  I would also point out that omitting of the "..."

> portion of my comment strips it of its context.  You just admonished me and

> told me to be respectful of the different perspectives that each of us is

> bringing to this occupation.  I thought we we're going to try to start

> playing nice.

> Harrison

> 646 706 1734

>

> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Drew Hornbein <dhornbein@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> I can bring this up at the internet working group meeting today at 5pm @

> liberty plaza. We can then bring it to the assembly.

> -Drew

>

> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Micah White <micahmwhite@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> Monetize #OCCUPYWALLSTREET?  You want to put corporate advertising on

> #OCCUPYWALLSTREET videos?

>

> On August 20th, you wrote to Adbusters and said:

>

> "My scheme is to commodify any traffic I manage to successfully drive to the

> occupywallst.org site, open it up and sell it as advertising space to

> corporations..."  and "A Corporate Funded Revolution is a contradiction in

> terms, its practically an oxymoron.  Something we've never considered

> before.  It's a revolutionary plan..."

>

> I think you should take this "Corporate Funded Revolution" to the GA for

> discussion.

>

> Micah

>

>

> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Harrison Schultz <schuh072@gmail.com>

> wrote:

>

> Hey Gang,

> I forgot to mention that one of my youtube clips of Reverend Billy's

> preaching on the 17th has blown up.  Google has invited me to monetize my

> clips.  Moreover, my boss, from a publicly traded marketing company who

> thinks we've all done a killer job, has offered to help me learn how to use

> adsense to make some cash for the occupation.

> Does anyone know if a central YouTube channel has been built for this?

> In solidarity,

> Harrison

>

>

>

>

>

< PREV INDEX SEARCH NEXT >