|From:||Matthew Bralow <email@example.com>|
|Sent time:||Sunday, September 25, 2011 8:30:30 PM|
|Subject:||Re: [september17discuss] YouTube Status?|
that rocks! you're right, it's not cheap! (and now people can watch
on MOBILE devices!... http://m.livestream.com from a smartphone
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 6:04 PM, M C <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Woo hoo great news!!
> I felt uncomfortable too, having to watch american express commercial before
> every video on 'global revolution' channel.
> And premium account on livestream is quite not cheap, so this is totally
> great news!
> From: Justin Wedes <email@example.com>
> To: "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [september17discuss] YouTube Status?
> Just FYI-
> Livestream sent an email today saying they were upgrading us to premium at
> no charge. Said ad providers felt uncomfortable about the content.
> Something 2 keep in mind w advertising
> Justin Wedes
> Activist & Educator, Brooklyn
> Use your voice!
> Web: www.OurSchoolsNYC.org
> Twitter: NYCPubSchooler
> There's something going on in the Islands... Check it out at
> On Sep 22, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Harrison Schultz <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Sounds good Drew,
> We'll get it before the GA for discussion because I happen to think its a
> good idea,
> I would also point out that you pointed out earlier today I believe that
> that radicals around the world have been funding us and that the money will
> eventually run out. Monetizing YouTube content is one way to help make this
> occupation financially autonomous. Recycling our message and using it to
> feed people here seems like a good idea to me and to those of my comrades
> I've suggested it to. I would also point out that omitting of the "..."
> portion of my comment strips it of its context. You just admonished me and
> told me to be respectful of the different perspectives that each of us is
> bringing to this occupation. I thought we we're going to try to start
> playing nice.
> 646 706 1734
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Drew Hornbein <email@example.com> wrote:
> I can bring this up at the internet working group meeting today at 5pm @
> liberty plaza. We can then bring it to the assembly.
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Micah White <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Monetize #OCCUPYWALLSTREET? You want to put corporate advertising on
> #OCCUPYWALLSTREET videos?
> On August 20th, you wrote to Adbusters and said:
> "My scheme is to commodify any traffic I manage to successfully drive to the
> occupywallst.org site, open it up and sell it as advertising space to
> corporations..." and "A Corporate Funded Revolution is a contradiction in
> terms, its practically an oxymoron. Something we've never considered
> before. It's a revolutionary plan..."
> I think you should take this "Corporate Funded Revolution" to the GA for
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Harrison Schultz <email@example.com>
> Hey Gang,
> I forgot to mention that one of my youtube clips of Reverend Billy's
> preaching on the 17th has blown up. Google has invited me to monetize my
> clips. Moreover, my boss, from a publicly traded marketing company who
> thinks we've all done a killer job, has offered to help me learn how to use
> adsense to make some cash for the occupation.
> Does anyone know if a central YouTube channel has been built for this?
> In solidarity,
|< PREV||INDEX||SEARCH||NEXT >|